4.1 Article

Symptoms at presentation in conservatively managed patients with non-functioning pituitary adenomas

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s42000-023-00444-8

关键词

Nonfunctioning; Pituitary adenoma; Symptoms; Comorbidities; Natural history; Observation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypopituitarism and tumor growth are rare in patients with non-functioning pituitary microadenomas (NFPmA). However, patients often present with non-specific symptoms. This study aims to compare the presenting symptomatology in patients with NFPmA and patients with non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFPMA).
PurposeHypopituitarism and tumor growth are rare in patients with non-functioning pituitary microadenomas (NFPmA). However, patients often present with non-specific symptoms. The aim of this brief report is to examine presenting symptomatology in patients with NFPmA compared to patients with non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFPMA).MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of 400 patients (347 NFPmA and 53 NFPMA) who were conservatively managed; no patients had indications for urgent surgical intervention.ResultsAverage tumor size was 4.5 +/- 1.9 and 15.5 +/- 5.5 mm for NFPmA and NFPMA, respectively (p < 0.001). At least one pituitary deficiency was present in 7.5% of patients with NFPmA and 25% of patients with NFPMA. Patients with NFPmA were younger (41.6 +/- 15.3 vs. 54.4 +/- 22.3 years, p < 0.001) and more commonly female (64.6 vs. 49.1%, p = 0.028). There was no significant difference reported for similarly high rates of fatigue (78.4% and 73.6%), headache (70% and 67.9%), and blurry vision (46.7% and 39.6%). There were no significant differences in comorbidities.ConclusionDespite smaller size and lower rate of hypopituitarism, patients with NFPmA presented with a high prevalence of headache, fatigue, and visual symptoms. This was not significantly different from patients with NFPMA who were conservatively managed. We conclude that symptoms of NFPmA cannot fully be attributed to pituitary dysfunction or mass effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据