4.8 Article

Xenogeneic cross-circulation for physiological support and recovery of ex vivo human livers

期刊

HEPATOLOGY
卷 78, 期 3, 页码 820-834

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000357

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Xenogeneic cross-circulation technique has been successfully used to support and rehabilitate declined donor livers, resulting in preservation of organ structure and function, improved viability markers, and potential for further research in organ recovery and rehabilitation.
Background and Aims: The scarcity of suitable donor livers highlights a continuing need for innovation to recover organs with reversible injuries in liver transplantation. Approach and Results: Explanted human donor livers (n = 5) declined for transplantation were supported using xenogeneic cross-circulation of whole blood between livers and xeno-support swine. Livers and swine were assessed over 24 hours of xeno-support. Livers maintained normal global appearance, uniform perfusion, and preservation of histologic and subcellular architecture. Oxygen consumption increased by 75% (p = 0.16). Lactate clearance increased from -0.4 +/- 15.5% to 31.4 +/- 19.0% (p = 0.02). Blinded histopathologic assessment demonstrated improved injury scores at 24 hours compared with 12 hours. Vascular integrity and vasoconstrictive function were preserved. Bile volume and cholangiocellular viability markers improved for all livers. Biliary structural integrity was maintained. Conclusions: Xenogeneic cross-circulation provided multisystem physiological regulation of ex vivo human livers that enabled functional rehabilitation,histopathologic recovery, and improvement of viability markers. We envision xenogeneic cross-circulation as a complementary technique to other organpreservation technologies in the recovery of marginal donor livers or as a research tool in the development of advanced bioengineering and pharmacologic strategies for organ recovery and rehabilitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据