4.4 Article

Long-term risk of cardiovascular implantable electronic device reinterventions following external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter: A nationwide cohort study

期刊

HEART RHYTHM
卷 20, 期 9, 页码 1227-1235

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.03.024

关键词

Device complication; Electrical cardioversion; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Intervention; Pacemaker; Reintervention; Replacement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that ECV in patients with CIED is associated with a higher risk of generator replacement and lead reintervention, with the risks of reinterventions more pronounced within the first year after cardioversion.
BACKGROUND External cardioversion (ECV) is an essential part of rhythm control of atrial fibrillation and flutter in patients with and without cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Long-term follow-up data on ECV-related CIED dysfunctions are limited. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk of CIED reintervention following ECV in a nationwide cohort. METHODS We identified CIED implants and surgical reinterventions from 2005 to 2021 in the Danish Pacemaker and ICD Register. We included CIED patients undergoing ECV from 2010 to 2019 from the Danish National Patient Registry. For each ECV-exposed generator, 5 matched generators without ECV were identified, and for each ECV-exposed lead, 3 matched leads were identified. The primary endpoints were generator replacement and lead reintervention. RESULTS We compared 2582 ECV-exposed patients with 12,910 matched patients with a pacemaker (47%), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (29%), cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemaker (6%), or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (18%). During 2 years of follow-up, 210 ECV-exposed generators (8.1%) vs 670 matched generators (5.2%) underwent replacements, and 247 ECV-exposed leads (5.6%) vs 306 matched leads (2.3%) underwent reintervention. Unadjusted hazard ratios were 1.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37-1.91; P <.001) for generator replacement and 2.39 (95% CI 2.01-2.85; P <.001) for lead reintervention. One-year relative risks were 1.73 (95% CI 1.41-2.12; P <.001) for generator replacement and 2.85 (95% CI 2.32-3.51; P <.001) for lead reintervention, and 2-year relative risks were 1.39 (95% CI 1.19-1.63; P <.001) and 2.18 (95% CI 1.84-2.57; P <.001), respectively. CONCLUSION ECV in patients with a CIED is associated with a higher risk of generator replacement and lead reintervention. The risks of reinterventions were more pronounced within the first year after cardioversion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据