4.3 Review

Gene Therapy for Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia

期刊

HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 790-797

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.01.018

关键词

Gene therapy; Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia; Ryanodine receptor; Calsequestrin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the past thirty years, the genetic basis of various inherited arrhythmia syndromes has been elucidated, providing insights into cardiomyocyte biology and regulatory pathways associated with cellular excitation, contraction, and repolarisation. As the understanding of genetic sequence manipulation and gene-based therapies has grown, exploring the potential of gene therapy for inherited arrhythmia has become possible. This review focuses on catechol-aminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) and discusses its clinical manifestations, genetic basis, molecular biology, and current research on gene therapy.
Over the last three decades, the genetic basis of various inherited arrhythmia syndromes has been eluci-dated, providing key insights into cardiomyocyte biology and various regulatory pathways associated with cellular excitation, contraction, and repolarisation. As varying techniques to manipulate genetic sequence, gene expression, and different cellular pathways have become increasingly defined and understood, the potential to apply various gene-based therapies to inherited arrhythmia has been explored. The promise of gene therapy has generated significant interest in the medical and lay press, providing hope for sufferers of seemingly incurable disorders to imagine a future without repeated medical intervention, and, in the case of various cardiac disorders, without the risk of sudden death. In this review, we focus on catechol-aminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), discussing the clinical manifestations, genetic basis, and molecular biology, together with current avenues of research related to gene therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据