4.2 Article

Perspectives of hospitalized heart failure patients: preferred and perceived participation roles in treatment decisions

期刊

HEART AND VESSELS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00380-023-02275-4

关键词

Heart failure; Patient preference; Decisional role; Shared decision-making; Patient-centered care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shared decision-making is crucial for optimal individual treatment and incorporates clinical evidence and patients' preferences. However, it is unclear how heart failure patients perceive their role in treatment decision-making. A survey was conducted among hospitalized heart failure patients, revealing that most patients preferred and chose an extremely passive approach, giving priority to physician recommendation over their own values and preferences.
Shared decision-making (SDM) is a pivotal process in seeking optimal individual treatment and incorporating clinical evidence and patients' autonomous preferences. However, patients' actual attitudes toward participation in decision-making for state-of-the-art heart failure (HF) treatment remain unclear. We conducted a questionnaire-based survey distributed by nurses and physicians specializing in HF care to assess patients' preferred and perceived participation roles in treatment decision-making during the index hospitalization, rated on five scales (from extremely passive to purely autonomous attitudes). Simultaneously, we investigated the important factors underlying treatment decision-making from the perspective of hospitalized HF patients. Of the 202 patients who were approached by our multidisciplinary HF team between 2017 and 2020, 166 (82.2%) completed the survey. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the clinical determinants of patients who reported that they left all decisions to physicians (i.e., extremely passive attitude). Of the 166 participants (male 67.5%, median age 73 years), 32.5% preferred an extremely passive attitude, while 61.4% reported that they actually chose an extremely passive attitude. A sole determinant of choosing an extremely passive decision-making role was lower educational status (odds ratio: 2.11, 95% confidence interval 1.11-4.00). The most important factor underlying the decision-making was Physician recommendation (89.2%). Notably, less than 50% considered In alignment with my values and preferences as an important factor underlying treatment decision-making. The majority of HF patients reported that they chose an extremely passive approach, and patients prioritized physician recommendation over their own values and preferences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据