4.5 Article

Perioperative care differences of surgical aortic valve replacement between North America and Europe

期刊

HEART
卷 109, 期 14, 页码 1106-1112

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-322350

关键词

heart valve prosthesis implantation; health care economics and organizations; aortic valve insufficiency; aortic valve stenosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the perioperative management of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) between North America and Europe. The results showed that European patients were older, had lower body mass index, and more severe aortic stenosis at baseline. In Europe, anticoagulant therapy at discharge was more aggressive, length of stay was longer, and discharges directly to home were less common. Rehospitalisation risk differed between continents and countries.
Objective To describe differences between North America and Europe in the perioperative management of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Methods Patients with moderate or greater aortic stenosis or regurgitation requiring SAVR were enrolled in a prospective observational cohort evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new stented bioprosthesis at 25 centres in North America (Canada and the USA) and 13 centres in Europe (Germany, the Netherlands, France, the UK, Switzerland and Italy). While all patients underwent implantation with the same bioprosthetic model, perioperative management was left to the discretion of participating centres. Perioperative care was described in detail including outcomes up to 1-year follow-up. Results Among 1118 patients, 643 (58%) were implanted in North America, and 475 (42%) were implanted in Europe. Patients in Europe were older, had a lower body mass index, less bicuspid disease and worse degree of aortic stenosis at baseline. In Europe, anticoagulant therapy at discharge was more aggressive, whereas length of stay was longer, and discharges directly to home were less common. Rehospitalisation risk was lower in Europe at 30 days (8.5% vs 15.9%) but converged at 1-year follow-up (26.5% vs 28.1%). Within continents, there were major differences between individual countries concerning perioperative management. Conclusion Contemporary perioperative management of SAVR patients varies between North America and Europe in patient selection, procedural techniques, antithrombotic regimen and discharge management. Furthermore, rehospitalisation differed largely between continents and countries. Hence, geographical setting must be considered during design and interpretation of trials on SAVR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据