4.6 Article

Sequencing the genomes of LPP-1, the first isolated cyanophage, and its relative LPP-2 reveal different integration mechanisms in closely related phages

期刊

HARMFUL ALGAE
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2023.102409

关键词

Phage; Cyanophage; Cyanobacteria; Lysogeny; Prophage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the 1960s, the first cyanophage, LPP-1, was isolated, leading to the study of various cyanophages and their interactions with cyanobacterial hosts to control blooms. Sequencing the genomes of LPP-1 and its relative, LPP-2, revealed that they belong to a group of short-tailed cyanophages distantly related to T7-like cyanophages. These phages have the ability to switch between lytic and lysogenic infection, which may explain the persistence of cyanobacterial blooms despite their phages.
In the early 1960s, the first cyanophage was isolated. The description of this phage, named LPP-1, led to the extensive investigation of various cyanophages and to the study of their interactions with their cyanobacterial hosts towards controlling blooms. Here, the genomes of LPP-1 and its putative relative, LPP-2 were sequenced. Sequencing these genomes revealed that LPP-1 and LPP-2 are members of a group of short-tailed cyanophages, which are distantly related to the T7-like cyanophages. Most of the phages in this group have the ability to lysogenize their hosts. Their ability to switch between lytic and lysogenic infection may explain the formation of cyanobacterial blooms despite the persistence of their phages. This lysogenic capacity of the LPP-1-like phages occurs despite the lack of an obvious integrase gene within their genomes. Interestingly, we show that LPP-2 integrates into the host genome through an integration site in high proximity to a recombination endonu-clease that may have integrase activity. Further understanding of cyanobacterial-phage relationships may pro-vide insight into their population dynamics and suggest novel approaches for control of destructive cyanobacterial blooms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据