4.7 Article

Reassessing variations in the small-strain stiffness of London Clay

期刊

GEOTECHNIQUE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ICE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1680/jgeot.21.00292

关键词

Anisotropy; small-strain stiffness; strain-rate; triaxial test

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-quality rotary core samples of natural London Clay were taken during the construction of Crossrail tunnels in Hyde Park, London. Advanced triaxial tests were performed on the samples, providing new insights into the stiffness variations at small- and medium-strain levels. The findings explain significant discrepancies in small-strain stiffness values reported in recent years, improving triaxial testing techniques and data interpretation.
High-quality rotary core samples of natural London Clay were taken during installation of subsurface instrumentation to monitor the ground response at Hyde Park, London, to the construction of Crossrail tunnels. An extensive programme of advanced triaxial tests was performed on specimens from London Clay divisions A3 to C. Detailed analysis of their response to undrained shearing in compression from their estimated in-situ stress state provides new insights into the magnitude and changes in stiffness at small- and medium-strain levels. A consistent trend in the variation of small-strain stiffness with depth and lithological division is established for the Hyde Park research site. Differences between the stiffness magnitudes from this investigation and those reported earlier by others are shown to be a result of the conditions before and during undrained shearing, particularly the ratio of shearing axial strain-rate to the preceding creep strain-rate. This provides an explanation for significant discrepancies in small-strain stiffness values reported in recent years, which have led to uncertainties regarding which values to adopt, particularly for numerical analysis applications. Understanding the relevance of the axial shearing to creep rate ratio allows for improved triaxial testing techniques and the subsequent interpretation of the test data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据