4.7 Article

Function Model Based on Nonlinear Transient Rheology of Rocks: An Analysis of Decadal GNSS Time Series After the 2011 Tohoku-oki Earthquake

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 50, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2023GL103259

关键词

GNSS time series prediction; the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake; postseismic deformation; function model; Bayesian optimization; regression analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a new function model that incorporates laboratory-derived constitutive laws in mechanical postseismic models. This model accurately predicts the decade-long time series of inland GNSS stations and decomposes them into displacements due to viscoelastic relaxation and afterslip. It provides insights into various deformation mechanisms and is an effective tool for forecasting long-term GNSS time series.
The postseismic Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) time series after the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake is often empirically explained by one or more logarithmic and exponential decay functions. However, a function model with these decay functions struggles to illuminate various deformation mechanisms. Here, we propose a new function model incorporating laboratory-derived constitutive laws (power-law flow and velocity-strengthening friction) utilized in mechanical postseismic models of the last decade. We demonstrated that our function model accurately predicts the decade-long time series of inland GNSS stations, including coastal areas where significant postseismic uplift continues now. Moreover, it decomposes them into displacements due to viscoelastic relaxation and afterslip, similar to results produced by previous stress-dependent postseismic models of the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake. This physics-based function model is an effective tool to ease the process of forecasting long-term GNSS time series by dividing them into two dominant mechanisms at the plate interface and the surrounding viscoelastic mantle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据