4.6 Review

JARID2 and EZH2, the eminent epigenetic drivers in human cancer

期刊

GENE
卷 879, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2023.147584

关键词

Epigenetics; EZH2; JARID2; Polycomb repressive complex; Cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, with approximately 10 million deaths reported in the World Health Organization's 2020 report. Epigenetics, which involves heritable phenotype alterations beyond DNA changes, plays a crucial role in the development of human cancers. The Enhancer of Zeste Homologue2 (EZH2) has been identified as a key catalytic subunit involved in several essential activities, including embryogenesis, and its dysregulation contributes to the onset and metastasis of various cancers. Jumonji AT Rich Interacting Domain2 (JARID2), another important nuclear factor, has significant coordination with the PRC2 family. This review focuses on discussing the role and mechanism of EZH2 and the important contribution of JARID2 in human cancers.
Cancer has become a prominent cause of death, accounting for approximately 10 million deaths worldwide as per the World Health Organization report 2020. Epigenetics deal with the alterations of heritable phenotypes, except for DNA alterations. Currently, we are trying to comprehend the role of utmost significant epigenetic genes involved in the burgeoning of human cancer. A sundry of studies have reported the Enhancer of Zeste Homologue2 (EZH2) as a prime catalytic subunit of Polycomb Repressive Complex2, which is involved in several pivotal activities, including embryogenesis. In addition, EZH2 has detrimental effects leading to the onset and metastasis of several cancers. Jumonji AT Rich Interacting Domain2 (JARID2), an undebated crucial nuclear factor, has strong coordination with the PRC2 family. In this review, we discuss various epigenetic entities, primarily focusing on the possible role and mechanism of EZH2 and the significant contribution of JARID2 in human cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据