4.3 Article

A centralized resource for bacterial-fungal interactions research

期刊

FUNGAL BIOLOGY
卷 127, 期 5, 页码 1005-1009

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2023.04.002

关键词

Bacterial -fungal interactions; Microbiome; Interkingdom interactions; Database; Web-service

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research on bacterial-fungal interactions (BFIs) has shown that fungi and bacteria often interact with each other in various ecosystems and microbiomes. However, assessing the current state of BFI research is challenging due to a lack of centralized resources. To address this issue, we have developed a publicly accessible database to document previously reported interactions between bacterial and fungal taxa, serving as a centralized resource for the field.
Research on bacterial-fungal interactions (BFIs) has revealed that fungi and bacteria frequently interact with one another within diverse ecosystems and microbiomes. Assessing the current state of knowledge within the field of BFI research, particularly with respect to what interactions between bacteria and fungi have been previously described, is very challenging and time consuming. This is largely due to a lack of any centralized resource, with reports of BFIs being spread across publications in numerous journals using non-standardized text to describe the relationships. To address this issue, we have developed the BFI Research Portal, a publicly accessible database of previously reported interactions between bacterial and fungal taxa to serve as a centralized resource for the field. Users can query bacterial or fungal taxa to see what members from the other kingdom have been observed as interaction partners. Search results are accompanied by interactive and intuitive visual outputs, and the database is a dynamic resource that will be updated as new BFIs are reported. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Mycological Society. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据