4.7 Article

Changes in chlorine content over time-Probe deposit sampling in a Finnish kraft recovery boiler

期刊

FUEL
卷 340, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127599

关键词

Ash deposits; Probe sampling; Temperature gradient; Aging mechanisms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deposit samples of different exposure times were collected from a Finnish kraft recovery boiler. Analyzing the morphology and chemical composition of the deposits revealed differences due to varying deposition mechanisms. Increasing exposure time led to enrichment in Cl content, which occurred through diffusion of Cl-vapours from the flue gas. Two aging mechanisms were identified within the deposits, involving alkali chloride layers and sulfation. Analysis of melting temperature showed a higher risk of corrosion in the Cl and K-rich layer adjacent to the steel surface.
Probe deposit samples of 1, 5, and 8 weeks exposure time were collected from the superheater area of a Finnish kraft recovery boiler. Deposit cross-sections were analysed regarding their morphology and chemical composi-tion using SEM/EDXA. Morphological differences along the probe's circumference were observed due to different prevailing deposition mechanisms. Overall enrichment in the deposit Cl content with increasing exposure time was observed. The Cl enrichment proceeds via diffusion of Cl-vapours from the flue gas into the deposit. Two deposit ageing mechanisms were identified within the deposit samples. First, alkali chloride layers formed on the furnace-facing side of deposit particles and also directly on the steel surface as a result of deposit ageing. Second, within the 5 and 8-week probe samples, sulfation of alkali chloride within the inner regions of the deposits was observed. Analysis of the local first melting temperature of the deposits showed a significant decrease within the Cl and K-rich layer adjacent to the steel surface, implying an increased risk for melt formation, and thus corrosion, in the direct vicinity of the steel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据