4.7 Article

Syngas production from CO2 reforming of glycerol by mesoporous Ni/CeO2 catalysts

期刊

FUEL
卷 341, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127717

关键词

Glycerol dry reforming; Mesoporous Ni-based catalyst; CO2 utilization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a mesoporous Ni/CeO2 catalyst with high specific surface area was prepared and used for glycerol dry reforming. Thermodynamic analysis was conducted to minimize Gibbs's free energy. The characterization results showed that a higher Ni content resulted in weaker interaction between Ni and the CeO2 support. The 5Ni/CeO2 catalyst exhibited the best catalytic activity and glycerol conversion reached 84.1% at 750 degrees C. The catalysts also showed excellent stability during the 10-hour catalytic process. The activation energy of the Ni-based catalyst for glycerol dry reforming was calculated using a kinetic model assuming a power law as a first-order reaction.
In this paper, the mesoporous Ni/CeO2 catalyst with high specific surface area was prepared by the colloidal solution combustion method and used for the production of syngas by glycerol dry reforming (GDR). The thermodynamic analysis was conducted by using a non-stoichiometric methodology based on the minimization of Gibbs's free energy. The characterization results show that the higher the Ni content, the weaker the interaction between Ni and the CeO2 support. 5Ni/CeO2 shows the most consistent Ni dispersion and uniform particle size, and it has the best catalytic activity in the GDR and the conversion of glycerol can reach 84.1 % at 750 degrees C. Besides, all catalysts exhibited excellent stability during the 10 h catalytic process. The temperature-programmed oxidation (TPO) results show that Ni loading ratio of 5 can reduce the production of filamentous carbon. Based on a kinetic model assuming a power law as a first-order reaction, the activation energy of the Ni-based catalyst for glycerol dry reforming was calculated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据