4.5 Article

Screening strategy for ketamine-based new psychoactive substances using fragmentation characteristics from high resolution mass spectrometry

期刊

FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL
卷 347, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111677

关键词

Screening strategy; Fragmentation characteristic; New psychoactive substances; Ketamine-based illegal drugs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New psychoactive substances (NPS), known as recreational designer drugs, pose significant risks to public health. The traditional targeted mass spectrometry methods face challenges in detecting recently discovered or unreported NPS. A novel screening strategy based on liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) was developed to detect both known and novel analogs of NPS by analyzing their fragmentation characteristics. The study also discovered an unexpected substituent effect that can distinguish geometric isomers and successfully detected newly marketed NPS using this strategy.
Recreational designer drugs called new psychoactive substances (NPS) are emerging and pose enormous risks to public health. Detection of recently discovered or unreported NPS remains a huge challenge by using traditional targeted mass spectrometry methods. Here a novel screening strategy was developed to detect both known and novel analogs of NPS based on fragmentation characteristics from liquid chroma-tography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). The HRMS fragmentation pathway of one selected NPS family was investigated to form a database containing predicted drugs as well as their mass char-acteristics. During the study, an unexpected substituent effect was found to distinguish geometric isomers. Seventy-eight seized samples were analyzed using this strategy, four ketamine-based NPS were detected and three of them were newly marketed. The substituent effect predicted the position of their phenylic substituent, the results were confirmed by NMR.(c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据