4.4 Article

Lemon juice improved color acceptance of aronia (Aronia melanocarpa) pound cake by copigmentation

期刊

FOOD SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

KOREAN SOCIETY FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-KOSFOST
DOI: 10.1007/s10068-023-01286-1

关键词

Aronia; Anthocyanin; Pound cake; Lemon juice; Color

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During pound cake preparation, the high temperature and alkaline baking soda can turn anthocyanins into a dark purplish color, which is not well accepted by consumers. To improve the red color of anthocyanins in pound cake with aronia powder, lemon juice was added at different concentrations. The addition of lemon juice enhanced both the sensory color perception and overall acceptance of the pound cake, while decreasing its hardness, gumminess, and chewiness. In a model system, the addition of lemon juice caused a bathochromic shift and hyperchromic effect in the UV-Vis absorption spectrum, indicating copigmentation between anthocyanins and copigments.
Anthocyanins can be changed into dark purplish color during pound cake preparation due to high temperature and alkaline baking soda, which lowers color acceptance by consumers. To stabilize a red color of anthocyanins in pound cake enriched with aronia (Aronia melanocarpa) powder, lemon juice was added to contain final concentrations of 0, 1, 2, and 3% (w/w) in the pound cake, which were assigned as control, PL1%, PL2%, and PL3%, respectively. As lemon juice amount increased, redness (a*) and sensory color perception as well as overall acceptance were enhanced, whereas hardness, gumminess, and chewiness decreased in texture profile analysis. In a model system, the addition of lemon juice to aronia solution caused bathochromic shift and hyperchromic effect in UV-Vis absorption spectrum, which are typical phenomena of copigmentation derived from interactions between anthocyanins and copigments. The results indicate that lemon juice improved color acceptance for aronia pound cake by copigmentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据