4.7 Article

The zeaxanthin present in a tomato line rich in this carotenoid is as bioavailable as that present in the food sources richest in this xanthophyll

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112751

关键词

Intestinal absorption; Bioaccessibility; Orange pepper; Corn; Lutein; Freeze-drying

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows that the tomato variety Xantomato can synthesize the essential compound zeaxanthin (ZEA) for the human body. In vitro digestion and Caco-2 cell experiments indicate that the bioavailability of ZEA in Xantomato is similar to that in other fruits and vegetables containing this compound, suggesting that Xantomato could be a nutritionally relevant source of ZEA.
It is strongly suspected that, like lutein, zeaxanthin (ZEA) plays a biological role in the human eye. Many studies also suggest that it could reduce the risk of age-related macular degeneration and improve cognition. Unfortu-nately, it is only present in a very limited number of foods. This is why a new tomato line, named Xantomato, whose fruits can synthesize this compound, was generated. However, whether ZEA in Xantomato is bioavailable enough for Xantomato to qualify as a nutritionally relevant ZEA source is not known. The objective was to compare the bioaccessibility and intestinal cell uptake efficiency of ZEA from Xantomato to that present in the richest sources of this compound. Bioaccessibility was assessed using in vitro digestions and uptake efficiency using Caco-2 cells. Xantomato ZEA bioaccessibility was not statistically different from that of common fruits and vegetables rich in this compound. Xantomato ZEA uptake efficiency (7.8%) was lower (P < 0.05) than that of orange pepper (10.6%) but not different from that of corn (6.9%). Therefore, the results of the in vitro digestion/ Caco-2 cell model suggest that Xantomato ZEA could be as bioavailable as that found in common food sources of this compound.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据