4.7 Article

Species substitution and mislabeling of ceviche, poke, and sushi dishes sold in Orange County, California

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 146, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109525

关键词

Mislabeling; Substitution; DNA barcoding; ready-To-eat; Seafood

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ready-to-eat seafood products are popular globally but are susceptible to species substitution and mislabeling. A study was conducted in Orange County, CA to investigate the mislabeling of sushi, poke, and ceviche dishes. DNA barcoding identified species substitution in 23.3% of samples and unacceptable market names in 45.6% of samples. Ceviche had the highest mislabeling rate at 85.3%, followed by poke at 61.8%, and sushi at 42.9%. The study highlights the need for proper labeling and further research in the seafood supply chain.
Raw, ready-to-eat (RTE) seafood products have become increasingly popular globally, but they are vulnerable to species substitution and mislabeling. DNA barcoding allows for fish species identification by extracting, ampli-fying, and sequencing a standardized gene target. A wide variety of fish products have been studied with DNA barcoding, but little investigation of ceviche and poke has occurred in the United States. Sushi is known to be a target of mislabeling but has not been extensively studied in Orange County, CA. The objective of this study was to investigate species substitution and mislabeling of sushi, poke, and ceviche dishes sold at restaurants in Or-ange County, CA. A total of 105 raw, RTE seafood products were collected, including sushi (n = 35), poke (n = 35), and ceviche (n = 35). All samples were sequenced with DNA barcoding or mini-barcoding. The identified species were compared against the menu names, verbal declarations by restaurant staff, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Seafood List to verify whether acceptable market names were used for each product. Of the 103 samples identified with DNA barcoding, species substitution was detected at a rate of 23.3% and unac-ceptable market names were found in 45.6% of samples. Overall, 63.1% of samples had some form of mis-labeling. When the mislabeling rates were divided based on product category, ceviche had the highest overall mislabeling rate (85.3%), followed by poke (61.8%), and sushi (42.9%). Mislabeling of ceviche and poke was primarily driven by the use of unacceptable market names, while species substitution was more common in sushi dishes. These rates reveal widespread mislabeling among raw, RTE seafood products and suggest the need for outreach efforts to ensure proper labeling of fish using acceptable market names, as well as further research into mislabeling within the raw, RTE seafood supply chain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据