4.7 Article

A sensitive fluorescent assay based on gold-nanoclusters coated on molecularly imprinted covalent organic frameworks and its application in malachite green detection

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 410, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135425

关键词

Molecularly imprinted polymers; Gold nanoclusters; Covalent organic frameworks; Malachite green; Fluorescent assay

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a one-pot reverse microemulsion polymerization was used to synthesize an efficient fluorescent hybrid probe (AuNCs@COFs@MIPs), which combined gold nanoclusters (AuNCs) with molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) and covalent organic frameworks (COFs), for selective detection of malachite green (MG). The probe showed specific recognition towards MG and triggered fluorescence quenching of AuNCs. The fluorescent response was linearly related to the concentration of MG and the probe exhibited a promising application for detecting residue of veterinary drugs in fish and water samples with a favorable recovery.
Malachite green (MG), as a parasiticide, is widely used in aquaculture to increase the production of the fishery industry. It poses a great danger to both the food system and the human body. In this study, a one-pot reverse microemulsion polymerization was employed to combine the gold nanoclusters (AuNCs) with molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) and covalent organic frameworks (COFs) to synthesize an efficient fluorescent hybrid probe (AuNCs@COFs@MIPs) for selective detection of MG. The specific recognition of AuNCs@COFs@MIPs towards MG triggers the fluorescence quenching of AuNCs. The fluorescent response was linearly related to the concentration over the range of 10-150 nmol/L with a limit of detection of 2.78 nmol/L. In addition, the proposed probe was further applied to fish and water samples. A favorable recovery ranged from 97.34 to 101.51 % toward trace amounts of MG indicating its promising application for detecting residue of veterinary drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据