4.7 Article

Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) stabilized by natural or synthetic emulsifiers for lutein delivery: Improved physicochemical stability, antioxidant activity, and bioaccessibility

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 403, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134465

关键词

Lutein; Nanostructured lipid carriers; Emulsifier; Physicochemical stability; Antioxidant activity; In vitro gastrointestinal digestion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the impacts of individual emulsifiers on the properties, stability, and digestion behavior of lutein-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers. The results showed that different emulsifiers have regulatory effects on the crystallization behavior of the carriers, and can improve the encapsulation efficiency and stability of lutein. Additionally, the individual emulsifiers and lutein endowed the carriers with excellent antioxidant capacity and optimal sustained release properties.
This study investigated the impacts of individual emulsifiers on the physicochemical stability, antioxidant ability, and in vitro digestion behavior of lutein-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs). NLCs particles stabilized by ethyl lauroyl arginate, rhamnolipid, or tea saponin were fabricated by high-pressure microfluidization method. Differential scanning calorimetry and X-ray diffraction results confirmed the regulatory effect of emulsifiers on the crystallization behavior of NLCs. NLCs stabilized by rhamnolipid presented higher encapsulation efficiency (94.73%) for lutein than those stabilized by tea saponin (90.39%) or ethyl lauroyl arginate (88.86%). Meanwhile, the stability of embedded lutein during storage or photothermal treatments was greatly enhanced. Individual emulsifiers, together with lutein, endowed NLCs with excellent antioxidant capacity. During in vitro digestion, rhamnolipid-stabilized NLCs showed the slowest release of free fatty acids (50.87%) and provided an optimal sustained release for lutein with relatively high bioaccessibility (23.01%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据