4.7 Article

A simplified dispersive solid-phase extraction using a shaped zirconium-based metal-organic framework: Constructing a novel, facile and efficient method for detecting plant growth regulators in citrus fruits

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 405, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134862

关键词

UiO-66; Sample preparation; Pesticides; Adsorption; HPLC-MS; MS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simplified dispersive solid-phase extraction (d-SPE) method using UiO-66-PDMS bead as the sorbent was designed to analyze plant growth regulators (PGRs) in citrus fruit. This method allowed for direct extraction of the targets from homogenized samples using UiO-66-PDMS bead, which could be easily separated with a tweezer, avoiding the need for centrifugation or filtration. The method demonstrated good linearity (R2 >= 0.9995) and low detection limits (0.09-0.17 ng/g), with recoveries ranging from 80.7 to 97.5%. The method was also employed to screen PGRs in ten different citrus fruits.
A facile, efficient and reliable method was designed and established to analyze the plant growth regulators (PGRs) in citrus fruit, based on a simplified dispersive solid-phase extraction (d-SPE) using a shaped zirconium-based metal-organic framework (UiO-66-PDMS bead) as the sorbent. In this method, UiO-66-PDMS beads directly extracted the targets from the homogenized and could be easily separated with a tweezer. It avoided the centrifugation or filtration operation required in normal d-SPE, greatly simplifying the d-SPE process. Moreover, the matrix substances were efficiently removed by this d-SPE process. The method showed good linearities (R2 >= 0.9995) and limits of detection (0.09-0.17 ng/g). The recoveries were in the range of 80.7-97.5 %. The intra-day and inter-day precisions were 1.5-6.3 % and 4.6-11.7 %, respectively. Additionally, the adsorption interactions between UiO-66-PDMS bead and PGRs were studied by ATR-FTIR and UV-vis DRS. Furthermore, the method was employed to screen the PGRs in ten different citrus fruits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据