4.7 Article

A TMT-based proteomic approach for investigating the effect of electron beam irradiation on the textural profiles of Litopenaeus vannamei during chilled storage

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 404, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134548

关键词

Litopenaeus vannamei; Electron beam irradiation; Proteomics; Texture; Refrigeration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effect of electron beam irradiation (EBI) on the textural quality of Litopenaeus vannamei. Proteomic analysis revealed that shrimp irradiated with 5 kGy exhibited optimal textural traits. The identified proteins were mainly involved in cellular processes, binding, catalytic functions, and various signaling pathways. Certain proteins were significantly correlated with textural properties and could be potential biomarkers to assess the irradiation-induced textural variation in shrimp.
To elucidate the effect of electron beam irradiation (EBI) on the textural quality of Litopenaeus vannamei, the tandem-mass-tag labeled proteomic method was conducted to illustrate the protein changes in shrimp muscle. The results suggested that shrimp irradiated with 5 kGy exhibited optimum textural traits of hardness, spring-iness, and chewiness. In total, 486 proteins were identified as differentially abundance proteins (DAPs) in multiple comparison groups. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that most of DAPs participated in cellular process, binding, and catalytic. etc. Various signaling pathways, such as RNA transport and oxidative phosphorylation, were notably enriched by DAPs. The correlation analysis indicated that some DAPs such as Myosin-XVIIIa, projectin, and beta-thymosin 3 were remarkably correlated with the textural properties, which could be pro-posed as potential biomarkers to assess the irradiation-induced textural variation in shrimp. This study provided an insightful understanding at the protein level to improve the application of EBI to shrimp preservation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据