4.7 Article

Paraquat exposure produces sex-dependent reduction in binge-like alcohol drinking in high alcohol-preferring mice

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2023.113685

关键词

Parkinson?s disease; Alcohol use disorder; Paraquat; High alcohol-preferring mice; Ethanol; Dopamine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of the PD-related neurotoxicant PQ on binge-like alcohol drinking and striatal monoamines in mice bred for high alcohol preference. It found that PQ decreased alcohol drinking and ventral striatal DOPAC levels in male mice but not in females.
Parkinson's Disease (PD) and Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) are disorders that involve similar dopaminergic neurobiological pathways and dysregulations in motivation-and reward-related behaviors. This study explored whether exposure to a PD-related neurotoxicant, paraquat (PQ), alters binge-like alcohol drinking and striatal monoamines in mice selectively bred for high alcohol preference (HAP), and whether these effects are sex-dependent. Previous studies found female mice are less susceptible to PD-related toxicants compared to male mice. Mice were treated with PQ or vehicle over 3 weeks (10 mg/kg, i.p. once per week) and binge-like alcohol [20% (v/v)] drinking was assessed. Mice were euthanized and brains were microdissected for monoamine an-alyses by high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (HPLC-ECD). PQ-treated HAP male mice showed significantly decreased binge-like alcohol drinking and ventral striatal 3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl-acetic acid (DOPAC) levels compared to vehicle-treated HAP mice. These effects were absent in female HAP mice. These findings suggest that male HAP mice may be more susceptible than female mice to PQ's disruptive effects on binge-like alcohol drinking and associated monoamine neurochemistry and may be relevant for under-standing neurodegenerative processes implicated in PD and AUD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据