4.6 Article

On the representativeness of polycrystalline models with transformation induced plasticity

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2022.103875

关键词

Computational homogenisation; Representative volume element; Crystal plasticity; Martensitic transformation; Finite element method

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This contribution analyzes the convergence behavior of representative volume elements (RVEs) with an increasing number of crystalline grains. The influence of crystallographic slip and mechanically induced martensitic formation is studied. Instead of analyzing a single micromechanical model, the representativeness of the RVEs is assessed through distinct macroscopic simulations. A computationally efficient Taylor's condition (FE-T) is assumed to make the convergence analysis feasible. The results showed that the macroscopic response converges regardless of whether the martensitic transformation is considered or not.
The convergence behaviour of representative volume elements (RVEs) with an increasing number of crystalline grains, which can undergo crystallographic slip and mechanically induced martensitic formation, is analysed in the present contribution. Instead of analysing a single micromechanical model subjected to relevant loading scenarios, the representativeness of the RVEs is assessed by running distinct macroscopic simulations that promote different deformation modes with several random realisations of the polycrystalline microstructure. To avoid the computational cost of FE2 approaches and make this convergence analysis feasible, a computationally efficient Taylor's condition (FE-T) is assumed. Then, an FE2 simulation is performed with periodic boundary conditions for a converged RVE size to illustrate the impact of Taylor's assumption on the macroscopic response. The introduction of martensitic transformation slightly increases the dispersion of the results. Nevertheless, the macroscopic response converges whether this phenomenon is considered or not.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据