4.2 Article

Promotion Committees and Attending Meetings Improve Promotion Rates for Early Career Faculty

期刊

FAMILY MEDICINE
卷 55, 期 5, 页码 325-327

出版社

SOC TEACHERS FAMILY MEDICINE
DOI: 10.22454/FamMed.2023.513661

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Academic promotion is an important goal for academic physicians. Attendance at professional meetings and the presence of a departmental promotions committee may be helpful factors in achieving academic promotion, while having an assigned mentor was not found to be helpful.
Introduction: Academic promotion is an important goal in an academic physician's career trajectory. Understanding the factors that influence success in academic promotion is important in providing appropriate guidance and resources.Methods: The Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) conducted a large omnibus survey of family medicine department chairs. Participants were asked about recent promotion rates within their department, as well as about whether their department had a promotion committee, whether faculty regularly met with the chair regarding preparation for promotion, whether faculty had been assigned mentors, and whether faculty attended national academic meetings.Results: The response rate was 54%. Most chairs were male (66.3%), White (77.9%), and aged 50 to 59 (41.3%) or 60 to 69 (42.3%) years. Attendance at professional meetings was associated with a higher rate of assistant-to-associate professor promotions. Departments with a committee to help faculty with promotions had higher rates of promotion for both assistant-to-associate and associate-to -full professor levels than departments without a committee. Promotion was not associated with assigned mentorship, support from the chair, departmental or institutional sponsorship of faculty development regarding promotion, or annual assessments of progress toward promotion.Conclusions: Attendance at professional meetings and the presence of a departmen-tal promotions committee may be helpful factors in achieving academic promotion. An assigned mentor was not found to be a helpful factor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据