4.7 Article

A neighborhood information-based adaptive differential evolution for solving complex nonlinear equation system model

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 216, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119455

关键词

Nonlinear equations system; Neighborhood information; Differential evolution; Adaptive parameter adjustment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a neighborhood information-based adaptive differential evolution (NIADE) algorithm for detecting and tracking multiple roots of nonlinear equation systems. NIADE features a dynamic neighborhood size mechanism, a novel mutation strategy based on neighborhood information, and combines neighborhood information with adaptive parameter adjustment for improved efficiency.
Nonlinear equation systems (NESs) widely exist in diverse fields, which have multiple equivalent roots in the search space. While several improved evolutionary algorithms (EAs) have been designed to solving NESs in recent years, they are ineffective to exploit the neighborhood information for evolution. This article thus develops a neighborhood information-based adaptive differential evolution (NIADE) to detect and track different roots in one run. It includes the following advantages: (i) a dynamic neighborhood size mechanism is designed to adjust the neighborhood size according to the state of evolution; (ii) a novel mutation strategy based on neighborhood information is introduced, which is beneficial to a completed search of the decision space; (iii) the neighborhood information is combined with adaptive parameter adjustment to enhance the search efficiency. The performance of NIADE is verified by solving the benchmark functions with different roots and different characteristics. The experimental results shows that NIADE has the ability to identify multiple roots simultaneously. Moreover, It achieves the better results than a number of existing advanced methods in terms of the success rate and root ratio.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据