4.7 Article

A hybrid evolutionary immune algorithm for fuzzy flexible job shop scheduling problem with variable processing speeds

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 233, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120891

关键词

Fuzzy flexible job shop scheduling problem; Variable processing speeds; Multi-objective; Hybrid evolutionary immune algorithm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on a fuzzy flexible job shop scheduling problem with variable processing speeds and proposes a multi-objective hybrid evolutionary immune algorithm (HEIA) to solve it by optimizing the fuzzy maximum completion time (makespan) and fuzzy total energy consumption simultaneously. The HEIA adopts a two left-shift heuristic based active decoding method to optimize the fuzzy makespan and incorporates two hybrid evolutionary strategies to enhance the exploration ability and exploitation ability. The proposed HEIA is tested on five types of instances to verify its effectiveness.
In this study, a fuzzy flexible job shop scheduling problem with variable processing speeds is considered. To address this problem, a multi-objective hybrid evolutionary immune algorithm (HEIA) is proposed, where the fuzzy maximum completion time (makespan) and fuzzy total energy consumption are optimized simultaneously. In the proposed HEIA, a two left-shift heuristic based active decoding method is proposed to optimize the fuzzy makespan. Then, two hybrid evolutionary strategies are used to separately enhance the exploration ability and exploitation ability, where a reference point-based angle selection strategy is incorporated to optimize the search mechanism. For the first evolutionary strategy, a Pareto similar information-based crossover operator is adopted to improve population diversity. For the second evolutionary strategy, a deep local search mechanism and four objective-driven neighborhood structures are developed. Finally, five types of instances are generated to verify the effectiveness of the proposed HEIA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据