4.6 Article

Formation of a Corrosion-Resistant and Anti-Icing Superhydrophobic Surface on Magnesium Alloy via a Single-Step Method

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 163, 期 5, 页码 C213-C220

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0801605jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. Heilongjiang Province Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar [JC201404]
  2. Special Innovation Talents of Harbin Science and Technology for Distinguished Young Scholar [2014RFYXJ005]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds of the Central University (HEUCFZ)
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [B201316]
  5. Program of International S&T Cooperation special project [2015DFA50050]
  6. Special Innovation Talents of Harbin Science and Technology [2014RFQXJ087]
  7. fund for Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements of Harbin [2013DB4BG011]
  8. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 51301050]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A superhydrophobic surface with chemical and long-time stability was fabricated on AZ31 magnesium alloy in a single-step via hydrothermal synthesis to improve corrosion resistance. The as-prepared surface repelled aqueous solutions with a static water contact angle of 156.7 degrees, and its superhydrophobicity was maintained for more than one year. The superhydrophobic surface showed anti-icing performance in a cold environment. The electrochemical measurement showed the superhydrophobic coating surface improved corrosion resistance for the Mg alloy substrate in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution. In this study, we sought higher efficiency and environmental friendliness to enhance the prospects for application of magnesium alloys. (C) The Author(s) 2016. Published by ECS. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse of the work in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据