4.6 Article

Clinical, pharmacological, and formulation evaluation of disulfiram in the treatment of glioblastoma-a systematic literature review

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 541-557

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2023.2190581

关键词

Anticancer activity; bioavailability; brain tumor; disulfiram; drug delivery systems; drug repositioning; glioblastoma; formulation development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastoma is a challenging CNS tumor, and the anti-alcoholism drug disulfiram (DS) has potential anticancer activity that could be used against GB. However, there are limitations in delivering DS to the brain-tumor tissue for effective treatment.
Introduction: Glioblastoma (GB) is one of the most challenging central nervous system (CNS) tumors in treatment options and response, urging the development of novel management strategies. The anti-alcoholism drug, disulfiram (DS), has a potential anticancer activity, and its complex mechanism of action is assumed to be well exploited against the heterogeneous GB.Area covered: Through a systematic literature review about repositioning DS to GB treatment, an evaluation of the clinical, pharmacological, and formulation strategies is provided to specify the challenges of drug delivery and thus to advance its clinical translation. From six databases, 35 articles were selected, including case report (1); clinical trials (3); original articles mainly representing in vitro and preclinical pharmacological data, and 10 dealing with technological approaches.Expert opinion: The repositioning of DS in GB treatment is facing drug and tumor-associated limitations due to the oral drug's low bioavailability, unwanted metabolism, and inefficient delivery to brain-tumor tissue. Development strategies using molecular encapsulation of DS and the parenteral dosage forms improve the anticancer pharmacology of the drug. The development of optimized drug delivery systems (DDS) shows promise for the clinical translation of DS into GB adjuvant therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据