4.6 Article

Observing the impact force and low-speed droplet behavior of wet surfaces with very-thin liquid films

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2022.110836

关键词

Liquid droplet impact; Liquid film; Low -speed droplet; Wet surface; Force measurement; Impact pressure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impact of a low-speed droplet on a very-thin liquid film on a solid surface was experimentally analyzed to understand its behavior and impact force. It was found that very-thin liquid films have high impact forces and delayed peak impact times. Increasing the film thickness resulted in gradually increasing impact forces, which can be explained by splash formation and interactions with the liquid film. The simulation results of surface impact-pressure variation were in agreement with the experimental observations, showing a damping of impact pressure immediately after droplet impact, followed by an increase in impact force at a later stage.
The impact of a low-speed droplet on a very-thin liquid film on a solid surface was analyzed experimentally by observing the impact force and droplet behavior. A high impact force and delayed peak impact time were observed with very-thin liquid films (with h/d < 0.05; his the liquid-film thickness and d is the droplet diameter). On increasing the film thickness, the impact force gradually increased. The increased impact force could be attributed to splash formation on the wet surface arising from lateral-jet formation at the instant of droplet impact, and interactions with the liquid film. Furthermore, this result was in agreement with numerical simu-lation results of the surface impact-pressure variation which indicated impact-pressure damping immediately after droplet impact, with a subsequent spread of the wet-surface impact-pressure area, thereby causing an in-crease in the impact force at a later stage. Thus, impact-pressure damping and force increments occurred at different time ranges after droplet impact.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据