4.6 Review

Review-Manganese Dissolution from Spinel Cathode: Few Unanswered Questions

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 164, 期 2, 页码 A106-A127

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0101614jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. MHRD (Ministry of Human Resource Development), Govt. of India
  2. IITK (Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The choice of cathode material critically influences the performance, cost and energy density in a Li ion battery. LiMn2O4 (LMO) cathode is an attractive cathode material because of its high rate capability, lowcost, safety and non-toxicity. However, lowcycle life or capacity fading with cycling is a big hurdle in the practical application of LMO cathodes. The dominant cause of the capacity fading, Mn dissolution from LMO, is still a challenge to overcome. In this review, we attempt to emphasize the loopholes in the understanding related to the Mn dissolution phenomenon in LMO cathodes in the presence of both aqueous and non-aqueous electrolytes. The underlying mechanism behind the dissolution process is often explained with the help of ionic charge disproportionation argument. Nevertheless, there are experimental and theoretical evidence in the literature to counter the simplistic view of dissolution due to charge disproportionation. Moreover, the correlation between the metal dissolution and the capacity fading is not causally established yet in the literature which hinders the formulation for a systematic strategy to prevent the capacity loss. In the current article we discuss all the relevant investigations related to the understanding of the cause, effect and prevention strategies of Mn-dissolution. We attempt to point out the gaps and contradictions in the literature and motivate further targeted studies in this seminally important material for better Li-ion batteries having higher rate capability and capacity retention. (C) 2016 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据