☆ 4.5 Article

NEgatiVE results in Radiomics research (NEVER): A meta-research study of publication bias in leading radiology journals

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2023)

相关参考文献

注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。

Article Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging Reporting Adherence in Peer-Reviewed and Preprint Manuscripts With the Highest Altmetric Attention Scores: A Meta-Research Study

Umaseh Sivanesan et al.

Summary: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the adherence to the CLAIM checklist in diagnostic accuracy AI studies in medical imaging and compare the reporting completeness between peer-reviewed manuscripts and preprints. The study retrospectively searched databases to select 100 studies with the highest Altmetric Attention Scores published since the release of CLAIM. It was found that overall adherence to CLAIM was low, and preprints had lower reporting completeness compared to peer-reviewed manuscripts.

CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES (2023)

添加到收藏夹

Review Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

Cardiac CT and MRI radiomics: systematic review of the literature and radiomics quality score assessment

Andrea Ponsiglione et al.

Summary: The methodological quality of studies using MRI and CT radiomics for cardiac applications is lacking. More standardized workflow and higher publication standards are needed for translation into clinical practice.

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Article Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

The Low Rate of Adherence to Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging Criteria Among Published Prostate MRI Artificial Intelligence Algorithms

Mason J. Belue et al.

Journal of the American College of Radiology (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Review Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Quality of reporting in AI cardiac MRI segmentation studies - A systematic review and recommendations for future studies

Samer Alabed et al.

Summary: This systematic review evaluated the quality of reporting in AI studies of CMR segmentation, highlighting key gaps and making recommendations for improving transparency and reproducibility. Studies were mostly published after 2019, with China, the US, and the UK being the main contributors, and compliance was highest in the model description domain.

FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

A decade of radiomics research: are images really data or just patterns in the noise?

Daniel Pinto dos Santos et al.

Summary: Although radiomics shows promise in analyzing medical image data, there are pitfalls to avoid for reproducibility. There is a gap in translating radiomics research into clinical practice, and more high-evidence studies focusing on prospective research with clinical impact are needed going forward.

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Review Clinical Neurology

Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis

Lorenzo Ugga et al.

Summary: This study systematically reviewed studies using radiomics and machine learning in patients with intracranial meningioma for diagnostic and predictive purposes. Promising results were found for preoperative meningioma grading using machine learning, but more high-quality studies are needed before clinical implementation.

NEURORADIOLOGY (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Review Oncology

Radiomics in Renal Cell Carcinoma-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Julia Muhlbauer et al.

Summary: Radiomics may have the potential to improve the discrimination of tumor dignity in renal masses, but its benefit in treatment response assessment remains unclear. Future studies should focus on clarifying the added value of radiomics in human assessment. Open science and shared data could enhance the reproducibility of studies in this field.

CANCERS (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Review Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

Current status and quality of radiomic studies for predicting immunotherapy response and outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Qiuying Chen et al.

Summary: Radiomics has the potential to predict immunotherapy response and outcomes in patients with NSCLC noninvasively. The mean radiomics quality score for included studies was 29.6%, with a wide variation in scores. Radiomics can divide patients into different risk groups with significant differences in overall survival and progression-free survival, showing promise as a predictive tool.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Review Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

Radiomics of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in renal cell carcinoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis

Stephan Ursprung et al.

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Article Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

Radiomics in nuclear medicine: robustness, reproducibility, standardization, and how to avoid data analysis traps and replication crisis

Alex Zwanenburg

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

The Dark Side of Radiomics: On the Paramount Importance of Publishing Negative Results

Irene Buvat et al.

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Review Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

Radiomics with artificial intelligence: a practical guide for beginners

Burak Kocak et al.

DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Review Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

Reproducibility and Generalizability in Radiomics Modeling: Possible Strategies in Radiologic and Statistical Perspectives

Ji Eun Park et al.

KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Review Oncology

Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine

Philippe Lambin et al.

NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2017)

添加到收藏夹

Article Medical Laboratory Technology

Dealing with the positive publication bias: Why you should really publish your negative results

Ana Mlinaric et al.

BIOCHEMIA MEDICA (2017)

添加到收藏夹

Article Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data

Robert J. Gillies et al.

RADIOLOGY (2016)

添加到收藏夹

Article Oncology

Radiomics: Extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis

Philippe Lambin et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER (2012)

添加到收藏夹

Article Clinical Neurology

Negative results: why do they need to be published?

Peter Sandercock

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE (2012)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias

Kerry Dwan et al.

PLOS ONE (2008)

添加到收藏夹

Article Psychology, Mathematical

G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

Franz Faul et al.

BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2007)

添加到收藏夹

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.