4.5 Article

The impact of influences in a medical screening programme invitation: a randomized controlled trial

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Review Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Categories of systematic influences applied to increase cancer screening participation: a literature review and analysis

Or Joseph Rahbek et al.

Summary: The study identified six major categories of influences on citizens' participation in cancer screening programmes, including misleading presentation of statistics, misrepresentation of harms vs. benefits, opt-out systems, recommendation of participation, fear appeals, and influencing healthcare professionals. These types of influence work through psychological biases and personal costs, and raise ethical concerns about informed decision making.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH (2021)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

The perception gap: how the benefits and harms of cervical cancer screening are understood in information material focusing on informed choice

Gabriela Byskov Petersen et al.

HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY (2020)

Review Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Nudging in screening: Literature review and ethical guidance

Bjorn Hofmann et al.

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING (2018)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Informed or misinformed choice? Framing effects in a national information pamphlet on colorectal cancer screening

Christina Sadolin Damhus et al.

HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY (2018)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Individual socioeconomic status and breast cancer diagnostic stages: a French case-control study

Mattea Orsini et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH (2016)

Article Oncology

The relationship between cancer incidence, stage and poverty in the United States

Francis P. Boscoe et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER (2016)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Effects of numerical information on intention to participate in cervical screening among women offered HPV vaccination: a randomised study

Mie Sara Hestbech et al.

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE (2016)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Informed choice in a time of too much medicine-no panacea for ethical difficulties

Minna Johansson et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Informed choice in a time of too much medicine-no panacea for ethical difficulties

Minna Johansson et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Patients' Expectations of the Benefits and Harms of Treatments, Screening, and Tests A Systematic Review

Tammy C. Hoffmann et al.

JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE (2015)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

To nudge or not to nudge: cancer screening programmes and the limits of libertarian paternalism

Thomas Ploug et al.

JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH (2012)

Editorial Material Health Care Sciences & Services

Informed participation in cancer screening: The facts are changing, and GPs are going to feel it

Linn Getz et al.

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE (2010)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Affect, risk, and decision making

P Slovic et al.

HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY (2005)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Randomised controlled trial of the effect of evidence based information on women's willingness to participate in cervical cancer screening

P Adab et al.

JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH (2003)