4.4 Article

pH regulates the pathogenicity and extracellular enzyme activity of Gilbertella persicaria on pitaya fruit

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY
卷 166, 期 4, 页码 403-413

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10658-023-02676-1

关键词

Pitaya; Gilbertella persicaria; pH; Organic acid; Extracellular enzyme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the pH change, organic acid secretion, pathogenicity of Gilbertella persicaria on pitaya fruit, and the activities of pectinase and cellulase. The results showed that G. persicaria colonization led to local acidification of pitaya fruit tissue, with pH decreasing from 4.76 to 4.41. Oxalic acid was the main organic acid secreted by G. persicaria. pH 4.4 enhanced the activities of pectinase and cellulase in pitaya fruit. The findings suggest that ambient pH regulates the pathogenicity of G. persicaria, providing potential methods to control fruit decay caused by this fungus.
pH is an important environmental factor affecting the pathogenicity of many fungi. The pH change in the decayed tissue of pitaya fruit inoculated with Gilbertella persicaria, the kinds of organic acids secreted by G. persicaria, the effects of three ambient pH values on pathogenicity, and the activities of pectinase and cellulase in pitaya fruit were studied. The results showed that colonization of pitaya fruit by G. persicaria was accompanied by local acidification of the host tissue, with the pH decreasing from 4.76 to 4.41. The main organic acid secreted by G. persicaria was oxalic acid, followed by citric acid. Furthermore, pH 4.4 enhanced the activities of pectin methylesterase (PME), polygalacturonase (PG), pectin methyl polygalacturonase (PMG) and pectatelyase (PL), as well as cellulase (Cx) and beta-glucosidase (beta-Glu), in pitaya fruit. Our results indicate that ambient pH is a regulatory factor for the pathogenicity of G. persicaria infecting pitaya fruit, and this study will aid in the development of new methods to control fruit decay caused by G. persicaria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据