4.1 Article

Selective laser capsulotomy complications: Management and prevention

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 1746-1749

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/11206721231158142

关键词

Cataract; capsulorhexis; capsulotomy; laser; complication

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study discusses how to manage and prevent incomplete laser cut and subsequent uncut tags of anterior capsular lens when performing selective laser capsulotomy. Results showed that using a 23-G vitrectomy scissors can avoid complications, while peeling the anterior capsulotomy disc with forceps may cause zonular stress and subsequent risks, and using the cystotomy needle tip may result in an irregular capsulotomy rim and micro tears. Therefore, key steps include anterior lens capsule staining and laser beam focusing for prevention.
Purpose To report how to manage and prevent the incomplete laser cut and following uncut tags of anterior capsular lens, performed using the selective laser capsulotomy. Methods We describe three possible approaches: peeling the anterior capsulotomy disc with forceps, breaking the tags using the cystotomy needle tip, or cutting them using a 23-G vitrectomy scissors. Results Using the 23-G vitrectomy scissors resulted in no complication. Peeling the anterior capsulotomy using the forceps instead caused zonular stress with subsequent risks of zonular dialysis, whereas using the cystotomy needle tip resulted in irregular capsulotomy rim and weakness all along the capsulotomy edge where micro tears caused a tear during the rest of cataract surgery. Conclusion Incomplete laser cut and subsequent discontinuous capsulotomy results in the presence of multiple tags which create strong adherence between the central capsulotomy disc and the peripheral capsule. Key steps of the procedure to prevent an incomplete laser cut, which are the anterior lens capsule staining and laser beam focusing, and how to correctly manage them, which may shorten the learning curve and enhance the outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据