4.7 Article

Ocrelizumab extended-interval dosing in multiple sclerosis during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a real-world experience

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ene.15891

关键词

extended-interval dosing; multiple sclerosis; ocrelizumab; SARS-CoV-2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the clinical implications of ocrelizumab administration delay in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The retrospective analysis found that delaying treatment did not impact clinical relapses, magnetic resonance imaging activity, or disability progression in MS patients. These findings suggest that delaying ocrelizumab administration during the pandemic does not compromise treatment efficacy.
Background and purposeDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, ocrelizumab administration was frequently postponed because of a lack of safety information and to favour vaccination. The clinical implications of ocrelizumab administration delay in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were assessed.MethodsRelapsing (RMS) and primary progressive (PPMS) MS patients receiving ocrelizumab for at least 6 months at our centre were retrospectively classified, according to the possible occurrence of a delay (>= 4 weeks) in treatment administration. Patients were categorized in the extended-interval dosing (EID) group in the presence of at least one delayed infusion; otherwise they were considered as part of the standard interval dosing (SID) cohort. MS history, magnetic resonance imaging examinations and B-cell counts were also retrospectively collected and analysed.ResultsA total of 213 RMS and 61 PPMS patients were enrolled; 115 RMS and 29 PPMS patients had been treated according to the SID regimen, whilst 98 RMS and 32 PPMS patients were included in the EID cohort. Average follow-up after delay was 1.28 +/- 0.7 years in the EID cohort. In RMS, comparing SID and EID patients, no differences were found considering the occurrence of clinical relapses (9.6% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.338), magnetic resonance imaging activity (9.8% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.374) or disability progression (11.3% vs. 18.4%, p = 0.103). Similar findings were observed in PPMS patients. In the pooled EID group, treatment delay correlated with CD19-positive relative (r = 0.530, p < 0.001) and absolute (r = 0.491, p < 0.001) cell counts, without implications on disease activity.ConclusionsSporadic ocrelizumab administration delay granted sustained treatment efficacy in our cohort. Prospective data should be obtained to confirm these observations and set up systematic extended-interval regimens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据