4.7 Review

Central vein sign and paramagnetic rim sign: From radiologically isolated syndrome to multiple sclerosis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ene.15922

关键词

central vein sign; magnetic resonance imaging; multiple sclerosis; paramagnetic rim sign; radiologically isolated syndrome; T2*-weighted images

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The widespread use of MRI has resulted in an increase in incidental findings in the central nervous system. Radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) is characterized by imaging-detected lesions suggestive of demyelinating disease without clinical episodes consistent with multiple sclerosis (MS). This article reviews two potential biomarkers, the central vein sign (CVS) and the paramagnetic rim sign (PRS), and their role in the diagnosis and prognosis of MS and RIS. Both CVS and PRS have shown to be accurate diagnostic markers with high sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing MS from other disorders.
The widespread use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has led to an increase in incidental findings in the central nervous system. Radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) is a condition where imaging reveals lesions suggestive of demyelinating disease without any clinical episodes consistent with multiple sclerosis (MS). The prognosis for RIS patients is uncertain, with some remaining asymptomatic while others progress to MS. Several risk factors for disease progression have been identified, including male sex, younger age at diagnosis, and spinal cord lesions. This article reviews two promising biomarkers, the central vein sign (CVS) and the paramagnetic rim sign (PRS), and their potential role in the diagnosis and prognosis of MS and RIS. Both CVS and PRS have been shown to be accurate diagnostic markers in MS, with high sensitivity and specificity, and have been useful in distinguishing MS from other disorders. Further research is needed to validate these findings and determine the clinical utility of these biomarkers in routine practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据