4.5 Article

Limitations, concerns and potential: attitudes of healthcare professionals toward preimplantation genetic testing using polygenic risk scores

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Editorial Material Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

The use of polygenic risk scores in pre-implantation genetic testing: an unproven, unethical practice

Francesca Forzano et al.

Summary: Although polygenic risk score analyses on embryos (PGT-P) are being marketed to parents using in vitro fertilisation as a tool for selecting embryos with lower disease risk, the utility of PRS in this context is limited and lacks clinical research support. Patients need to be informed about the limitations of using PRSs in this way, and a societal debate about the selection of individual traits should take place before further implementation of this technique in this population.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2022)

Review Obstetrics & Gynecology

Decisional needs of patients considering preimplantation genetic testing: a systematic review

Lin Cheng et al.

Summary: This systematic review examines the needs and sources of support in patients' decision-making regarding preimplantation genetic testing. The review found that patients require relevant and concise information about the treatment, as well as information on healthcare and alternative reproductive options. Excessive and complex information can hinder decision-making. It was also found that patients receive support from mass media, significant individuals, and healthcare professionals, while obstetricians and gynecologists provide less support compared to other professionals.

REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE (2022)

Review Genetics & Heredity

A systematic review of the views of healthcare professionals on the scope of preimplantation genetic testing

Maria Siermann et al.

Summary: This article focuses on the perspectives of healthcare professionals on the appropriate scope of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). The study found that defining a "serious genetic condition" is complex and involves considering severity, high penetrance, absence of treatability, and patients' experience. Professionals experienced friction between setting limits and respecting patients' autonomy during the decision-making process.

JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY GENETICS (2022)

Review Obstetrics & Gynecology

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy: Has the Controversy Settled? A Review

Roisin Mortimer et al.

Summary: This review focuses on the controversies surrounding PGT-A, with suggestions for further research, including the development of non-invasive preimplantation testing and the use of controversial embryos.

CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS (2022)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Should preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic disease be offered to all - or none?

Nathan R. Treff et al.

FERTILITY AND STERILITY (2022)

Review Genetics & Heredity

A review of normative documents on preimplantation genetic testing: Recommendations for PGT-P

Maria Siermann et al.

Summary: Based on the analysis of normative documents on preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for monogenic conditions (PGT-M), the ethical acceptability of PGT for polygenic conditions (PGT-P) is found to be limited. Various factors need to be considered in the development of guidelines and the appropriateness of PGT.

GENETICS IN MEDICINE (2022)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Polygenic embryo screening: four clinical considerations warrant further attention

S. Pereira et al.

Summary: Recent advances in polygenic scores have allowed for embryo screening, but reproductive specialists' perspectives have not been prominent in discussions. A multidisciplinary roundtable, including reproductive specialists, was convened to discuss the implications of polygenic embryo screening. This Opinion highlights four clinically relevant issues associated with PES that have not been discussed in the literature.

HUMAN REPRODUCTION (2022)

Editorial Material Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Polygenic embryo testing: understated ethics, unclear utility

Josephine Johnston et al.

NATURE MEDICINE (2022)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Polygenic risk score for embryo selection-not ready for prime time

Alex Polyakov et al.

Summary: The application of genetic risk scores in embryo selection for disease prevention raises concerns regarding data limitations, technical constraints, and ethical considerations. Further research and ethical reflection are necessary before offering embryo selection based on polygenic risk scores to patients.

HUMAN REPRODUCTION (2022)

Article Ethics

Three models for the regulation of polygenic scores in reproduction

Sarah Munday et al.

Summary: This paper discusses different regulatory models for the application of polygenic scores in embryo selection, including disease-based models, laissez-faire models, and a novel Welfarist Model. Each model has its own strengths and weaknesses in regulating polygenic scores. The research explores the application of polygenic scores in predicting non-disease traits such as intelligence.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS (2021)

Review Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy - a Castle Built on Sand

Norbert Gleicher et al.

Summary: PGT-A, a routine add-on for IVF, has not been clinically validated in determining human embryo chromosomal status and may actually reduce live birth chances for many patients. Recent studies have shown the PGT-A hypothesis to be mistaken.

TRENDS IN MOLECULAR MEDICINE (2021)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

The Imperative of Responsible Innovation in Reproductive Medicine

Sebastiaan Mastenbroek et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2021)

Article Biology

Utility of polygenic embryo screening for disease depends on the selection strategy

Todd Lencz et al.

Summary: This study predicts the expected reduction in complex disease risk following polygenic embryo screening for a single disease based on the liability threshold model. Selecting embryos with the lowest PRS can lead to substantial risk reductions, highlighting the importance of selection strategy. Various factors such as variance explained by the PRS and the number of embryos impact the utility of screening.
Article Ethics

Polygenic risk scoring of human embryos: a qualitative study of media coverage

Tiny Pagnaer et al.

Summary: Analyzing 535 news articles revealed that 8.8% portrayed embryo polygenic scoring positively, 36.8% expressed negative attitudes, and 54.4% remained neutral. Main ethical themes identified included concerns about a slippery slope towards designer babies, child and parental well-being, societal impact, deliberate choice, and societal readiness.

BMC MEDICAL ETHICS (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Problems with Using Polygenic Scores to Select Embryos

Patrick Turley et al.

Summary: Polygenic Embryo Selection In Vitro (ESPS) is a controversial genetic screening service that involves personalized predictions based on polygenic risk scores, but also raises debates over expected gains and potential unintended consequences. Responsible communication is essential, along with a need for a society-wide conversation about the implications of this technology.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2021)

Review Genetics & Heredity

Polygenic risk scores: from research tools to clinical instruments

Cathryn M. Lewis et al.

GENOME MEDICINE (2020)

Article Developmental Biology

Clinical experience of preimplantation genetic testing

Martine De Rycke et al.

REPRODUCTION (2020)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Screening Human Embryos for Polygenic Traits Has Limited Utility

Ehud Karavani et al.

Article Endocrinology & Metabolism

Utility and First Clinical Application of Screening Embryos for Polygenic Disease Risk Reduction

Nathan R. Treff et al.

FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY (2019)

Article Genetics & Heredity

New literacy challenge for the twenty-first century: genetic knowledge is poor even among well educated

Robert Chapman et al.

JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY GENETICS (2019)

Editorial Material Genetics & Heredity

Genetic counseling globally: Where are we now?

Kelly E. Ormond et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART C-SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS (2018)

Review Genetics & Heredity

The personal and clinical utility of polygenic risk scores

Ali Torkamani et al.

NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS (2018)

Article Genetics & Heredity

Are physicians prepared for whole genome sequencing? a qualitative analysis

K. D. Christensen et al.

CLINICAL GENETICS (2016)

Review Genetics & Heredity

Prenatal and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis

Joris Robert Vermeesch et al.

NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS (2016)

Review Genetics & Heredity

Stakeholder engagement in policy development: challenges and opportunities for human genomics

Amy A. Lemke et al.

GENETICS IN MEDICINE (2015)

Article Health Policy & Services

Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research

Lawrence A. Palinkas et al.

ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2015)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Knowledge and Educational Needs about Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) among Oncology Nurses

Gwendolyn P. Quinn et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (2014)

Review Obstetrics & Gynecology

Psychological impact of preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a review of the literature

J. C. Karatas et al.

REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE (2010)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Newborn blood spot screening in four countries: Stakeholder involvement

Beth K. Potter et al.

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY (2008)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Knowledge and attitudes towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Germany

U Meister et al.

HUMAN REPRODUCTION (2005)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: patients' experiences and attitudes

SA Lavery et al.

HUMAN REPRODUCTION (2002)