4.5 Article

BRAT1-related disorders: phenotypic spectrum and phenotype-genotype correlations from 97 patients

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 31, 期 9, 页码 1023-1031

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01410-z

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BRAT1 biallelic variants are associated with two syndromes, one is a severe phenotype with rigidity and multifocal seizure, and the other is a milder phenotype with cerebellar atrophy. Genotype-phenotype correlations show that different variants are associated with different phenotypes, with nonsense and frameshift variants causing the severe phenotype, missense variants more likely associated with the milder phenotype, and splice variants showing variable phenotypes.
BRAT1 biallelic variants are associated with rigidity and multifocal seizure syndrome, lethal neonatal (RMFSL), and neurodevelopmental disorder associating cerebellar atrophy with or without seizures syndrome (NEDCAS). To date, forty individuals have been reported in the literature. We collected clinical and molecular data from 57 additional cases allowing us to study a large cohort of 97 individuals and draw phenotype-genotype correlations. Fifty-nine individuals presented with BRAT1-related RMFSL phenotype. Most of them had no psychomotor acquisition (100%), epilepsy (100%), microcephaly (91%), limb rigidity (93%), and died prematurely (93%). Thirty-eight individuals presented a non-lethal phenotype of BRAT1-related NEDCAS phenotype. Seventy-six percent of the patients in this group were able to walk and 68% were able to say at least a few words. Most of them had cerebellar ataxia (82%), axial hypotonia (79%) and cerebellar atrophy (100%). Genotype-phenotype correlations in our cohort revealed that biallelic nonsense, frameshift or inframe deletion/insertion variants result in the severe BRAT1-related RMFSL phenotype (46/46; 100%). In contrast, genotypes with at least one missense were more likely associated with NEDCAS (28/34; 82%). The phenotype of patients carrying splice variants was variable: 41% presented with RMFSL (7/17) and 59% with NEDCAS (10/17).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据