4.7 Article

A randomised phase II study of modified FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (JCOG1407)

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 181, 期 -, 页码 135-144

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.12.014

关键词

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer; mFOLFIRINOX; Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel; Phase II randomised Trial; First-line chemotherapy

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of mFOLFIRINOX with that of GnP for LAPC. The results showed that GnP had better response rate, CA19-9 response, and mild gastrointestinal toxicities, making it a candidate for a subsequent phase III trial.
Aim: We compared the efficacy of modified 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) with that of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).Methods: Patients with untreated LAPC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive mFOLFIR-INOX or GnP. One-year overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. The major second-ary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) response, and adverse events. The sample size was 124 patients to select a more effective regimen with a minimum probability of 0.85 and to examine the null hypoth-esis of the 1-year OS < 53%.Results: Of the 126 patients enrolled from 29 institutions, 125 were deemed eligible. The 1-year OS was 77.4% (95% CI, 64.9-86.0) and 82.5% (95% CI, 70.7-89.9) in the mFOLFIRINOX and GnP arms, respectively. The median PFS was 11.2 (95% CI, 9.9-15.9) and 9.4 months (95% CI, 7.4-12.8) in the mFOLFIRINOX and GnP arms, respectively. The RR and CA19-9 response rate were 30.9% (95% CI, 19.1-44.8) and 57.1% (95% CI, 41.0-72.3) and 42.1% (95% CI 29.1-55.9) and 85.0% (95% CI, 70.2-94.3) in the mFOLFIRINOX and GnP arms, respectively. Grade 3-4 diarrhoea and anorexia were predominant in the mFOL-FIRINOX arm.Conclusion: GnP was considered the candidate for a subsequent phase III trial because of its better RR, CA19-9 response, and mild gastrointestinal toxicities. Both regimens displayed higher efficacy in the 1-year survival than in the historical data of gemcitabine monotherapy. 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据