Corticospinal excitability and reflex modulation in a contralateral non-stretched muscle following unilateral stretching

PurposeMuscle stretching effect on the range of motion (ROM) and force deficit in non-stretched muscle, and the underlying mechanisms, is an ongoing issue. This study aimed to investigate crossover stretching effects and mechanisms on the plantar flexor muscles.MethodsFourteen recreationally active females (n = 5) and males (n = 9) performed six sets of 45-s static stretching (SS) (15-s recovery) to the point of discomfort of the dominant leg (DL) plantar flexors or control (345-s rest). Participants were tested for a single 5-s pre- and post-test maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) with each plantar flexor muscle and were tested for DL and non-DL ROM. They were tested pre- and post-test (immediate, 10-s, 30-s) for the Hoffman (H)-reflex and motor-evoked potentials (MEP) from transcranial magnetic stimulation in the contralateral, non-stretched muscle.ResultsBoth the DL and non-DL-MVIC force had large magnitude, significant (down arrow 10.87%, p = 0.027, pn(2) = 0.4) and non-significant (down arrow 9.53%, p = 0.15, pn(2) = 0.19) decreases respectively with SS. The SS also significantly improved the DL (6.5%, p < 0.001) and non-DL (5.35%, p = 0.002) ROM. The non-DL MEP/M-Max and H-Max/M-Max ratio did not change significantly.ConclusionProlonged static stretching improved the stretched muscle's ROM. However, the stretched limb's force was negatively affected following the stretching protocol. The ROM improvement and large magnitude force impairment (statistically non-significant) were transferred to the contralateral muscles. The lack of significant changes in spinal and corticospinal excitability confirms that the afferent excitability of the spinal motoneurons and corticospinal excitability may not play a substantial role in non-local muscle's ROM or force output responses.

Automated summary

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects and mechanisms of muscle stretching on the range of motion (ROM) and force deficit in non-stretched muscles. The results showed that static stretching significantly improved the ROM of the stretched muscles, but had a negative impact on force production. Furthermore, both the ROM improvement and force impairment were transferred to the contralateral muscles, and there were no significant changes in spinal and corticospinal excitability.