4.6 Article

Iron Phosphate/Bacteria Composites as Precursors for Textured Electrode Materials with Enhanced Electrochemical Properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 163, 期 10, 页码 A2139-A2148

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0101610jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. French Reseau sur le Stockage Electrochimique de l'Energie (RS2E)
  2. ANR SRB project of the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-14-CE33-0003-01]
  3. NSERC
  4. CIHR
  5. NRC
  6. University of Saskatchewan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An important issue linked to the wide implementation of the Li-ion technology for large scale application deals with the development of eco-efficient synthesis processes for making electrode materials. We report herein the preparation of homogeneous, dense and nanometric layers of amorphous ferric phosphates (a-FePO4 center dot xH(2)O) using a bacteria (Sporosarcina pasteurii) as nucleating template. By combining various analytical tools (including thermal analyses, Raman and XANES spectroscopies) we show that the the bacterial cell wall plays a key role in the nucleation process thereby controlling particle size and precipitation kinetics. Moreover, we demonstrate that a mild thermal treatment of the bacteria/(a-FePO4 center dot xH(2)O) core shell structure leads to the decomposition of the insulating bacteria into a carbon-based residue, which is beneficial to the electrode conductivity. This as-prepared material electrochemically reacts with lithium (Fe-III/Fe-II) at a mean voltage of 3.0 Volts (vs. Li+/Li degrees) with performances (first cycle reversibility, reversible capacity, power efficiency, cycle life) that equal or even overpass those of abiotic a-FePO4 center dot xH(2)O materials mixed with conductive carbon through harsh or complex procedures. Overall, this bio-templating route represents a soft/cheap alternative to tackle conductivity issues in battery electrode processing. (C) 2016 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据