4.6 Article

Effect of Organic Cations on Hydrogen Oxidation Reaction of Carbon Supported Platinum

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 163, 期 14, 页码 F1503-F1509

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0511614jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Fuel Cell Technology Office [DE-EE0006962]
  2. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan through the Japan-US Cooperation on Clean Energy Technology Program
  3. Los Alamos National Security, LLC [DE-AC52-06NA25396]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effect of organic cations on hydrogen oxidation reaction (HOR) of carbon supported platinum (Pt/C) is investigated using three 0.1 M alkaline electrolytes, tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAOH), tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBAOH) and tetrabutylphosphonium hydroxide (TBPOH). Rotating disk electrode experiments indicate that the HOR of Pt/C is adversely impacted by time-dependent and potential-driven chemisorption of organic cations. In-situ infrared reflection adsorption spectroscopy experiments indicated that the specific chemisorption of organic cations drives the hydroxide co-adsorption on Pt surface. The co-adsorption of TMA(+) and hydroxide at 0.1 V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode is the strongest; consequently, complete removal of the co-adsorbed layer from Pt surface is difficult even after exposure the Pt surface to 1.2 V. Conversely, the chemisorption of TBP+ is the weakest, yet notable decrease of HOR current density is still observed. The adsorption energies, Delta E, for TMA(+), TBA(+), and TBP+ on Pt (111) surface from density functional theory are computed to be -2.79, -2.42 and -2.00 eV, respectively. The relatively low adsorption energy of TBP+ is explained by the steric hindrance and electronic effect. This study emphasizes the importance of cationic group on HOR activity of alkaline anion exchange membrane fuel cells. (C) The Author(s) 2016. Published by ECS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据