4.6 Article

Redox-zoning in high-energy subterranean estuaries as a function of storm floods, temperatures, seasonal groundwater recharge and morphodynamics

期刊

ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
卷 290, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2023.108418

关键词

Submarine groundwater discharge; Coastal aquifer; Biogeochemistry; Land-sea transition; Redox dynamics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the effects of storm floods, seasonal changes of temperatures and groundwater recharge rates, as well as beach morphodynamics on the redox zoning in subterranean estuaries. The research found that under the given conditions, redox dynamics can occur down to a depth of 20 m. Beach morphodynamics appear to be the most important factor for the transience of redox zones compared to the other factors.
Redox conditions are a major control for the concentrations and mass fluxes of water constituents, e.g., nutrients, metals and organic molecules within subterranean estuaries (STE). Due to the transient flow and transport processes in STEs as well as the variable temperatures and input of redox reactants, redox zoning in the STE is believed to be highly dynamic. In the present study we analyzed the individual and combined effects of storm floods, seasonal changes of temperatures and groundwater recharge rates, as well as beach morphodynamics on the redox zoning in the STE. For this purpose, a 2D cross-shore density-dependent flow and reactive transport model was set up representing a beach aquifer exposed to high-mesotidal and medium-to high-energy wave conditions, as well as to storm floods. The simulation results show that under the given conditions, redox dynamics may occur down to a depth of 20 m. Morphodynamics appear to be the most important factor for the transience of redox zones compared to the other factors. Seasonal changes in meteoric groundwater recharge rates appear to be least relevant for the redox dynamics in STEs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据