4.4 Article

Effects of total saponins from Rhizoma Dioscoreae Nipponicae on expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin-2 and Tie-2 receptors in the synovium of rats with rheumatoid arthritis

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 79, 期 5, 页码 264-271

出版社

ELSEVIER TAIWAN
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcma.2015.10.012

关键词

angiogenesis; angiopoietin 2; Rhizoma Dioscoreae Nipponicae; Tie-2; total saponins; vascular endothelial growth factor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30873420]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: This study aimed to determine the effects of total saponins from Rhizoma Dioscoreae Nipponicae (TS-RDN) on the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin (Ang)-2 and Tie-2 (endothelial tyrosine kinase receptor) receptors in the synovium of rats with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (collagen-induced arthritis; CIA), and to examine the mechanisms of TS-RDN in alleviating RA. Methods: The CIA rat model was established and the animals were randomly divided into control, CIA model, TS-RDN, diosgenin, and tripterygium groups. Fluorescent polymerase chain reaction was performed to detect VEGF expression in the rat knee joint synovium. Additionally, immunohistochemical assay was used to detect protein expression of Ang-2 and Tie-2 in the rat knee joint synovium. Results: Expression of VEGF, Ang-2, and Tie-2 in the model group was significantly higher than in the control group (p < 0.01). After TS-RDN, tripterygium and diosgenin treatment, VEGF and Ang-2 expression was lower than in the model group (p < 0.01). However, Tie-2 expression showed no significant difference. The effects of TS-RDN on VEGF expression were more marked than those of tripterygium and diosgenin (p < 0.01). Conclusion: TS-RDN might reduce the expression of VEGF, Ang-2, and Tie-2 in the synovium, thus inhibiting synovial angiogenesis and playing a therapeutic role in RA. Copyright (C) 2016, the Chinese Medical Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据