4.5 Article

Outcomes of the second withdrawal of anti-seizure medication in patients with pediatric-onset epilepsy

期刊

EPILEPSIA
卷 64, 期 6, 页码 E93-E97

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/epi.17594

关键词

drug-resistant epilepsy; drug tapering; drug withdrawal; recurred epilepsy; risk factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Withdrawal of anti-seizure medication (ASM) is challenging, especially in patients with recurrent seizures. In this observational study, the success rate of ASM withdrawal for a second time in patients with pediatric-onset epilepsy was 41.3%. Factors such as absence of self-limiting epilepsy syndrome, shorter seizure-free intervals before the second withdrawal of ASM, and relapse during tapering after the initial withdrawal of ASM were significantly associated with the success of ASM withdrawal for a second time.
Withdrawal of anti-seizure medication (ASM) is challenging, especially in patients with recurrent seizures. Only limited evidence exists regarding the success rate and recurrence risk factors after withdrawal of ASM for a second time in patients with pediatric-onset epilepsy. In this observational study, we evaluated 104 patients with recurrent pediatric-onset epilepsy who had ASM withdrawn for a second time. The success rate was 41.3% after the second withdrawal of ASM. The absence of a self-limiting epilepsy syndrome, shorter seizure-free intervals before the second withdrawal of ASM, and relapse during tapering after the initial withdrawal of ASM were negative factors significantly associated with the success of ASM withdrawal for a second time. Even after a second seizure recurrence, all patients eventually became seizure-free after restarting their previous ASM (78.7%) or readjusting the ASM (21.3%). Our findings that 40% of patients with recurrent pediatric-onset epilepsy could achieve long-term seizure freedom and that all patients with a second seizure recurrence remained seizure-free suggest that ASM may be withdrawn for a second time after carefully stratifying clinical risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据