4.6 Article

Occupational exposure to veterinary antibiotics: Pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin in humans after dermal, inhalation and oral uptake-A clinical study

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2023.104139

关键词

Enrofloxacin; Pharmacokinetic; Inhalation; Oral; Dermal; PBPK model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Occupational exposure to veterinary antibiotics in hen houses at poultry feeding farms, particularly enrofloxacin, was investigated in this study. The pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin and its metabolite ciprofloxacin were studied in six healthy volunteers using dermal, oral, and inhaled intake routes. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling was used but showed underestimation of elimination rate, indicating limitations in available information and physico-chemical properties of the drug. The results suggested that oral uptake, including airborne enrofloxacin and direct hand-mouth contact, was the major source of occupational exposure in hen houses, while dermal exposure was considered negligible.
Occupational exposure to veterinary antibiotics in hen houses at poultry feeding farms was demonstrated by biomonitoring campaigns in the past. The objective of this study was to investigate pharmacokinetics of three uptake routes: dermal, oral and inhaled. In an open-label cross-over study, six healthy volunteers were exposed to single occupational relevant doses of enrofloxacin. Plasma and urine samples were analysed for enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling based on bioanalysis data showed underestimation for the elimination rate in comparison to experimental data pointing towards a lack of sufficient ADME information and limitations of available physico-chemical properties of the parent drug. The data obtained in this study indicate that oral uptake with its various sources, e.g. airborne enrofloxacin, direct handmouth contact, is the major source for occupational exposure to enrofloxacin in hen houses. Dermal exposure was considered negligible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据