4.8 Article

Regional Sources and Sinks of Atmospheric Particulate Selenium in the United States Based on Seasonality Profiles

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 57, 期 19, 页码 7401-7409

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c08243

关键词

selenium; biogeochemical cycle; PM 2; 5; measurement-model intercomparison; IMPROVE network; seasonality; sources; sinks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the sources and sinks of atmospheric selenium by analyzing PM2.5 data from 82 sites in the US from 1988 to 2010. Coal combustion was identified as the main source of selenium in most regions, while wet deposition played an important role as a sink. These findings contribute to a better understanding and prediction of selenium distribution under climate change.
Selenium (Se) is an essential nutrient for humans and enters our food chain through bioavailable Se in soil. Atmospheric deposition is a major source of Se to soils, driving the need to investigate the sources and sinks of atmospheric Se. Here, we used Se concentrations from PM2.5 data at 82 sites from 1988 to 2010 from the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) network in the US to identify the sources and sinks of particulate Se. We identified 6 distinct seasonal profiles of atmospheric Se, grouped by geographical location: West, Southwest, Midwest, Southeast, Northeast, and North Northeast. Across most of the regions, coal combustion is the largest Se source, with a terrestrial source dominating in the West. We also found evidence for gas-to-particle partitioning in the wintertime in the Northeast. Wet deposition is an important sink of particulate Se, as determined by Se/PM2.5 ratios. The Se concentrations from the IMPROVE network compare well to modeled output from a global chemistry-climate model, SOCOL-AER, except in the Southeast US. Our analysis constrains the sources and sinks of atmospheric Se, thereby improving the predictions of Se distribution under climate change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据