4.8 Review

A Critical Review on the Factors that Influence Opportunistic Premise Plumbing Pathogens: From Building Entry to Fixtures in Residences

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 57, 期 16, 页码 6360-6372

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c04277

关键词

opportunistic premise plumbing pathogens; Legionella; residences; water quality; plumbing design; water use pattern; water heaters; pipe material; fixtures

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Residential buildings present unique conditions for OPPP exposure. However, comprehensive studies on the topic are lacking, and there are significant knowledge gaps regarding OPPP growth, the impact of residential plumbing design and components, water heater types and temperature settings, and common pipe materials. Furthermore, the effects of plumbing code requirements and guidelines for OPPP risk management in residences have not been assessed.
Residential buildings provide unique conditions for opportunistic premise plumbing pathogen (OPPP) exposure via aerosolized water droplets produced by showerheads, faucets, and tubs. The objective of this review was to critically evaluate the existing literature that assessed the impact of potentially enhancing conditions to OPPP occurrence associated with residential plumbing and to point out knowledge gaps. Comprehensive studies on the topic were found to be lacking. Major knowledge gaps identified include the assessment of OPPP growth in the residential plumbing, from building entry to fixtures, and evaluation of the extent of the impact of typical residential plumbing design (e.g., trunk and branch and manifold), components (e.g., valves and fixtures), water heater types and temperature setting of operation, and common pipe materials (copper, PEX, and PVC/CPVC). In addition, impacts of the current plumbing code requirements on OPPP responses have not been assessed by any study and a lack of guidelines for OPPP risk management in residences was identified. Finally, the research required to expand knowledge on OPPP amplification in residences was discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据