4.8 Article

Life Cycle Assessment of Coastal Enhanced Weathering for Carbon Dioxide Removal from Air

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 57, 期 15, 页码 6169-6178

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c08633

关键词

ocean alkalization; enhanced silicate weathering in coastal systems; enhanced rock weathering; negative emissions technology; ocean alkalinity enhancement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coastal enhanced weathering (CEW) is a carbon dioxide removal approach that involves spreading crushed silicate minerals in coastal zones to be naturally weathered by waves and tidal currents, releasing alkalinity and removing atmospheric carbon dioxide. The use of olivine as a mineral candidate for CEW has been proposed due to its abundance and high carbon uptake potential. However, there are engineering challenges, such as particle size and transportation, as well as potential environmental stresses that may limit its applicability. The use of larger particle sizes could be a potential solution, but they dissolve much slower and require several years to become carbon and environmental net negative.
Coastal enhanced weathering (CEW) is a carbon dioxide removal (CDR) approach whereby crushed silicate minerals are spread in coastal zones to be naturally weathered by waves and tidal currents, releasing alkalinity and removing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). Olivine has been proposed as a candidate mineral due to its abundance and high CO2 uptake potential. A life cycle assessment (LCA) of silt-sized (10 mu m) olivine revealed that CEW's life-cycle carbon emissions and total environmental footprint, i.e., carbon and environmental penalty, amount to around 51 kg CO2eq and 3.2 Ecopoint (Pt) units per tonne of captured atmospheric CO2, respectively, and these will be recaptured within a few months. Smaller particle sizes dissolve and uptake atmospheric CO2 even faster; however, their high carbon and environmental footprints (e.g., 223 kg CO2eq and 10.6 Pt tCO2-1, respectively, for 1 mu m olivine), engineering challenges in comminution and transportation, and possible environmental stresses (e.g., airborne and/or silt pollution) might restrict their applicability. Alternatively, larger particle sizes exhibit lower footprints (e.g., 14.2 kg CO2eq tCO2-1 and 1.6 Pt tCO2-1, respectively, for 1000 mu m olivine) and could be incorporated in coastal zone management schemes, thus possibly crediting CEW with avoided emissions. However, they dissolve much slower, requiring 5 and 37 years before the 1000 mu m olivine becomes carbon and environmental net negative, respectively. The differences between the carbon and environmental penalties highlight the need for using multi-issue life cycle impact assessment methods rather than focusing on carbon balances alone. When CEW's full environmental profile was considered, it was identified that fossil fuel dependent electricity for olivine comminution is the main environmental hotspot, followed by nickel releases, which may have a large impact on marine ecotoxicity. Results were also sensitive to transportation means and distance. Renewable energy and low-nickel olivine can minimize CEW's carbon and environmental profile.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据