4.5 Article

Preliminary assessment of microbial mats in seawater metal remediation

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-023-11134-8

关键词

Microphytobenthic community; Diatom; Cyanobacteria; Bioremediation; Seawater Cr removal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to determine the efficiency of Cr removal from seawater by microbial mats and investigate the effect of Cr on the microphytobenthic community and the influence of aeration. The results showed that microbial mats efficiently removed Cr from seawater, with removal efficiencies of 95% and 99% for different conditions. The study highlights the potential of microbial mats for Cr removal and the positive effect of aeration on the removal efficiency.
Microbial mats have a special role in the removal of metals in marine environment. This study aimed to experimentally determine the efficiency of Cr removal from seawater by microbial mats. The effect of Cr on the microphytobenthic community and the influence of an aerated condition on the removal of metal and microorganisms were also considered. Hence, microbial mat samples were subdivided in 4 groups: submerged in Cr (chromium 2 mg/L without aeration), Cr + O-2 (chromium 2 mg/L with aeration), SW + O-2 (filtered seawater with aeration), and a control: SW (filtered seawater with neither chromium nor aeration). Water and microbial mat subsamples were used to determine Cr concentrations, organic matter content, granulometry, physicochemical parameters, chlorophyll a, phaeopigments, and quantitative analysis of the microphytobenthic community. Cr removal efficiency from seawater was 95% for the Cr treatment and 99% for the Cr + O-2 treatment. The abundance of cyanobacteria tended to decrease between the initial and final days of the assay, whereas the opposite trend was observed for diatoms. Two aspects are worth noting in the paper: microbial mats efficiently removed Cr from seawater at a concentration of 2 mg Cr/L and the removal of Cr by microbial mats was more efficient with water aeration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据